Kandi Burruss Explains Lawsuit Against Kim Zolciak: ‘It’s Not A Publicity Stunt!’

Written by thejasminebrand in Blog
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Pin on PinterestShare on LinkedIn

kandi burruss-explains why shes suitng kim zolciak-rhoa-dont be tardy for the party-the jasmine brand

I’ve said this time and time again, the real drama between these reality stars happens off the camera. Such is the case of former reality BFF’s (well, BFF’s may be a bit of an exaggeration) Kandi Burrus and Kim Zolciak of the Real Housewives of Atlanta. This week, we learned that Kandi is suing Kim for not properly compensating her for the three-year-old song, “Don’t Be Tardy For The Party.

Kandi and co-writer Rodney Richards filed paperwork in a Georgia court seeking:

Damages for copyright infringement due to Defendants’ unauthorized and unlawful licensing, distribution and sale of Plaintiffs’ creative works, namely a sound recording embodying a performance of a musical composition entitled ‘Tardy for the Party. ‘ “

Kim issued a response to TooFab, suggesting that Kandi is suing her as a publicity stunt:

“This is nothing short of a publicity stunt, I find this lawsuit funny yet sad. Coming after me now and this song is 4 years old? I have in fact overpaid Kandi and have documents to prove it and my legal team will handle this accordingly.”

And apparently, Kandi has caught wind of Kim’s ‘publicity stunt’ comment, releasing a statement to HipHollywood. She responded:

“It’s time for the whole ordeal to be over. I asked TuneCore to take the song down in December 2012. They did. Kim sent an affidavit to put it back up, which they did. TuneCore then informed me that in order for the song to be taken down permanently I would need to file suit to have it removed. I never wanted to go that route but after being told that it is the only way to get the song removed, I had no other choice….This is not a publicity stunt. I no longer wish for anyone to benefit from the work that Don Vito and I created.”

Interesting exchange. What are your thoughts on the lawsuit? Should Kandi take an ‘L’, and let the song and its profit go? Or should Kim Zolciak take the song down or pay-up? P.S. Atlanta stays w/ the drama–right?

  • Tazzy

    She should have sued Kim a long time ago. Kim has been giving her the run-around. Even if she gets one cent, it’s one cent she’s owed because she created, wrote and produced the song! Kim is full of it!

  • Anonymous

    If it wasn’t for kandi there would be no song especially because Kim can’t sing! Thank God for auto tune!!!!

  • Roberto Raymon

    This is so silly. Kim just doesn’t understand the music business. Kandi owns the song. The artist never owns the music.

  • Wow, it’s about time Kandi be properly compensated, I mean how you in the music industry & you let someone get over on you?! Makes no sense!

  • うわー、このポストは楽しい、私妹は |したがって、|、 のことをそう分析しています彼女を伝える|お知らせ| |知っているので}私は{伝えるつもりです。
    一部予約販売 中古正規品 http://www.raydennissteckler.com