Rihanna Hits Topshop With 5 Million Dollar Lawsuit
Fashion costs–especially if you’re using the likeness of a popstar, without her permission. According to Page Six, Rihanna is suing British retail giant Topshop — chaired by billionaire Sir Philip Green. Reportedly, she’s hitting them with a $5 million for selling T-shirts with image, without her consent.
Allegedly, an inside source shared:
Rihanna’s management asked Topshop a number of times to stop selling her image and were told, ‘We do what we want.’ They buy the pictures from a photographer, but they do not pay the artist licensing fees. Unfortunately, UK law does not protect the artist. What is most offensive for Rihanna is that they basically told her, ‘Go to hell. We don’t care; we are going to continue selling you.’ Topshop is now in the United States. They set up in Manhattan and Nordstrom, but they know better than to do this in the US because they would get in trouble.
The source continued:
Even though the UK laws don’t protect the artist, she has decided to move forward and sue Topshop. She has spent almost $1 million in litigation at this point. She says it’s the principle, and wants to make a statement about it. They are taking advantage of artists. It is just exploitation. What they are doing is wrong.
Topshop has released a response to the outlet, stating:
This issue is related to a T-shirt provided to Topshop by a third-party supplier. We are aware it is the subject of litigation. [There are] public documents” available for inspection in the London court. The amount of damages sought has not been articulated anywhere in the claimant’s document.



Previous Article
Next Article
Nolan Wells, Teen Who Mysteriously D!ed In Mississippi, Friends Say They’ve Received B0mb & D3ath Thr3ats After No Charges Filed In His D3ath
Autopsy Of Nolan Wells – Mississippi Teen Who Mysteriously D!ed While On A Boating Trip With People Believed To Be His Friends – Reveals No Water Was Found In His Lungs, Throat Or Stomach
Atlanta Police ‘Top 10 Most Wanted’ Fug!tive Jonathan Soto Arr*sted In Connection With 2023 M*rder Of Nightclub Owner Michael Gidewon
United Airlines Passenger Says She Had To Sit Next To Man Who Pleasured Himself While Staring At Her During Flight, Claims She Was Given Only $100 Travel Credit & Man Faced No Consequences
Brittney Griner’s Estranged Wife Cherelle Seeks Financial Support, Says She Can’t Cover Monthly Bills Without Help
BookTok Sensation Quan Millz, Author Of Viral Books Such As “This H*e Got Roaches In Her Crib” & “My Pastor Got A Stripper Pregnant,” Signs With Prominent Literary Agency Verve
Washington D.C. Man Accused Of K*lling 2-Month-Old Twin Out Of Jealousy, Then Blaming His Nonverbal Autistic Son
No Criminal Charges Will Be Filed In D3@th Of 18-Year-Old Nolan Wells, Who Was Found D3@d After Fourth Of July Trip With Friends
the singer is wrong. if she signed a photo release with the photograher, she hasn’t a leg to stand on in court. this is how photographers earn when photographing celebrities (often for free or on spec). read the contract before you sign next time.
baopublishing.it
jordan 11 maize http://digital-worrld.com/?key=jordan-11-maize