Robin Thicke ‘Respectfully’ Slaps Marvin Gaye’s Family With A Lawsuit

Screen shot 2013-08-16 at 1.29.38 AM

You know that popular Robin Thicke song, Blurred Lines, that we’re all boppin’ our heads to these days? Yeah, that one. There seems to be a bit of a legal issue with it. This week, Robin ThickePharrell Williams and Clifford Harris, Jr. filed a lawsuit in California federal court against Marvin Gaye‘s family and Bridgeport Music, which owns some of Funkadelic’s compositions. What’s the beef? According to The Hollywood Reporter,  at issue are complaints about similarities between “Blurred Lines” and at least two songs. According to the suit,

Plaintiffs, who have the utmost respect for and admiration of Marvin Gaye, Funkadelic and their musical legacies, reluctantly file this action in the face of multiple adverse claims from alleged successors in interest to those artists. Defendants continue to insist that plaintiffs’ massively successful composition, ‘Blurred Lines,’ copies ‘their’ compositions.

robin thicke-sues marvin gaye lawsuit-blurred lines-the jasmine brand

The lawsuit continues:

Gaye defendants are claiming ownership of an entire genre, as opposed to a specific work. But there are no similarities between plaintiffs’ composition and those the claimants allege they own, other than commonplace musical elements. Plaintiffs created a hit and did it without copying anyone else’s composition.

Reportedly, Marvin Gaye’s family (the Gayes) and Bridgeport are said to be threatening litigation should the plaintiffs (Robin ThickePharrell Williams and Clifford Harris, Jr.) not pay a monetary settlement. Rather than wait for the lawsuit to proceed, the plaintiffs are going to court to determine the parties’ respective rights and obligations.

There are 11 comments for this article
  1. orchidjones at 11:01 am

    i knew it was coming but not this way…no one can tell me Blurred Lines does not sound like Marvin Gaye’s Give it Up. Every time i hear it i think of Marvin’s song, so why is Robin/pharrell suing the Gayes… Pharrell knew exactly what he was doing as a producer and composer of this song.

    • DIVA at 11:43 am

      Exactly….but I do like Blurred Lines they did a good on the song. Hopefully they can settle this out of court.

    • Anonymous at 6:08 pm

      Blurred Lines uses a familiar sound of Marvin Gaye’s hit but it is not s direct copy of it. Actually, I hear Michael jackson and Prince “sounds” in the track as well. I hope the judge views the case in Thicke’s favor.

  2. naenae at 3:59 pm

    what musician has not borrowed music from other musicians? everything today, including music has been influenced by something in the past. for instance, will.i.am, jay z, lil wayne..

    • Roosevelt Rider at 5:15 pm

      2naenae,that is an insane statement you wrote. So Imma assume you are pretty young and cut you some slack.Before hip hop came around for the most part people didn’t use other people’s songs in their songs,it was called stealing,now it’s called sampling.Either way you have to pay to use someone else’s song in your song.Hope you learned something.

      • Anonymous at 8:09 pm

        2naenae…all three of those artists RELY on other people’s creations to do what they do. Not one of them has a great musical idea in their head. You young folks don’t demand much talent from your icons. Try some rock and roll bands for a change…people playing instruments and actually singing a melody…quite a concept !

  3. Chaney at 6:27 am

    When I first heard this song, the first thing that I thought of was “Got to give it up” by Marvin Gaye. If there is a law suit of course he would win over the poor Gaye family.

  4. nintendocodesgenerateurgratuit.wordpress.com at 6:37 pm

    Nice post. I learn something totally new and challenging on sites I stumbleupon on a daily basis.
    It will always be useful to read articles from other authors
    and use a little something from other websites.

    My page 3DS (nintendocodesgenerateurgratuit.wordpress.com)

  5. Vivienne Westwood Melissa shoes sale at 1:17 pm

    Her show was staged in a vast white pavilion built on the banks of the Seine, close by the Alexandre Trois bridge.In an impassioned note left on the seats, Dame Vivienne spoke of the importance of learning from the past, of respecting the planet, and securing the future.And, in a Paris season when both Nicolas Ghesquière at Balenciaga, and Christophe Decarnin at Balmain, have reached back to punk, Westwood, the high priestess of the punk movement, ignored it.Her inspirations, instead, touched on Tutankhamen, Inca priestesses, Henri Matisse, Japanese ‘Noh’ theatre, Comedia dell’Arte, and the ballet.As the music switched from Rachmaninov to Scottish folk tunes, these references gave rise to many of Westwood’s best-loved silhouettes: cleavage-bodices, with swathed shoulders, allied to ruched,bunched long skirts, or a perky mini, in a tapestry-floral. Pale metallic tartan taffeta was used for bloused dresses with wide belts and a train; and a floral ballgown, with fishtail-skirt, was cinched with a belt stamped with the word ‘fragile’.
    Vivienne Westwood Melissa shoes sale http://www.nbest.org/pop/htmlarea//Vivienne-Westwood-Melissa-shoes-sale.html

  6. twitter at 5:13 pm

    Good web site you’ve gott here.. It’s difficult to find high quality
    writing like yours these days. I honestly appreciate individuals
    like you! Take care!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *