Charlotte Police Release Partial Keith Scott Shooting Video [WARNING Graphic Footage]
Keith Scott
On Saturday, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department released a portion of video footage of the police shooting of Keith Scott. On Tuesday, Scott was killed by police, but his death has caused controversy, as police and witnesses have varying accounts of what happened. His wife recorded footage, which went viral immediately. See the footage below.
Part 1
Part 2
Today, a graphic video was released to the public. The footage was taken from police body camera footage, it captures the moments before police shot Scott. See the footage below.
Here’s another view of the shooting.
There’s much controversy surrounding whether Scott was carrying a gun. Witnesses say that he did not have a gun, while police have released photos of a gun they recovered at the scene.
Police also released a more detailed explanation of the incident, claiming that Scott was wearing an ankle holster and had a marijuana blunt. When asked if the released footage may calm protestors, Chief Kerr Putney said
The footage itself will not create in anyone’s mind absolute certainty as to what this case represents and what the outcome should be. The footage only supports all of the other information.
At his news conference, Putney said that his officers didn’t break the law but noted that the state is continuing its investigation.
Officers are absolutely not being charged by me at this point, but again, there’s another investigation ongoing.
Putney said that Scott was “absolutely in possession of a handgun,” and that officers also saw marijuana in his car, prompting them to act.
The city has been on edge ever since Scott’s shooting death.
Photos: CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT
Follow us: @theJasmineBRAND on Twitter | theJasmineBRAND on Facebook| theJasmineBRAND_ on Instagram
Previous Article
Next Article
Jarvis Butts, Man Who M*rdered 13-Year-Old Na’ziyah Harris After Learning She Was Pregnant w/ His Child, Found De@d in Prison 
TikTok Star Brenay Kennard Says ‘Husband-Stealing’ Lawsuit Ruined Her Income As Judge Delays $1.75 Million Payment ![[UPDATE] Judge Grants $1 M*rder Bond For Georgia Woman Accused Of Taking Pills To Induce Abortion](https://thejasminebrand.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/image-1774380219-1-620x600.jpeg)
[UPDATE] Judge Grants $1 M*rder Bond For Georgia Woman Accused Of Taking Pills To Induce Abortion 
Fentanyl Discovered In Packaging Of Barbie Dolls Sold At Discount Store 
Latto Hints At New Music Following Brief Hiatus, Fans Think A Baby Announcement Could Be Next 
Alabama Woman Mauled By 3 Pit Bulls While Walking To Work, Police Warned About Dogs Hours Before V!olent Attack 
Filmmaker Ava DuVernay Debuts Boyfriend At The Oscars – Here’s What We Know About Her Mystery Man 
‘Access Hollywood, ‘Karamo & “The Steve Wilkos Show’ Canceled As NBCUniversal Stops Producing Syndicated Shows
I have heard reports that he was not supposed to have a gun because of his felony. People should know that in A lot of southern states it is not illegal for a felon to own a gun. As a matter of fact NC is one of those states that passed legislation in 2014 to restore gun rights to felons.
Bull$h*t. Why are you just making stuff up?
”
Of the states that require a person to have a permit or license to carry a handgun, we found only one that appears to allow felons to get permits. Oregon allows a person who has been found guilty of a felony by reason of insanity to apply for a gun license (Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.250(1)(c). Also, North Carolina allows a person convicted of a felony to get a permit if he has been pardoned and the permit does not violate the terms of the pardon (N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-404(c)(1)).
@fawn the deplorable, NC allows felon’s to regain their right to own a gun and they are not alone. in 2014 SERVERAL states passed legislation making it possible and easy for felons’ to regain their gun rights.
Cite a source?
I’m not doing your research for you. Do your own. Just do it somewhere other than Breitbart. You know, somewhere reputable.
I provided a quote, from a legitimite source. It was not Breitart, something I don’t even read. Again, you’re just making stuff up. Besides, Federal law usurps state law, so it is irrelevant if a conviction is federal.
if a conviction is federal.