R. Kelly In Default For Sexual Assault Case In Chicago After Being MIA For Court

R.Kelly Mugshot
R. Kelly In Default For Child Sex Abuse Lawsuit Case In Chicago After Being MIA For Court
R. Kelly‘s legal troubles are piling. According to recent reports, a Chicago judge ruled the disgraced singer into default on a civil child sex abuse lawsuit. He hasn’t appeared in court to defend himself since the suit was filed.

R.Kelly
Due to new federal charges filed on Valentine’s Day, R. Kelly’s lawyer, Steve Greenberg, says his defaulted civil suit will likely be postponed. The plaintiff, a woman named Heather Williams, alleges that R. Kelly lured her into a sexual relationship in 1998 when she was just 16-years-old. This would’ve made the singer around 31-years-old. She says they met on a street in Chicago.
But this civil suit is only the tip of the iceberg of the 53-year-old’s legal troubles. He was recently sued for $3.4 million for back rent connected to his infamous studio. The final hearing for Heather Williams’ civil suit is scheduled for March 10th, while his federal trials for child pornography and other related charges are expected in April and July.
His lawyer hasn’t spoken out on the default status yet.
What are your thoughts on R. Kelly not showing up for court? Tell us in the comments. [Page Six]
Written by Miata Shanay
Previous Article
Next Article
‘Baddies’ Star Meatball Speaks Out After Receiving 5 Years Probation From Looting Incident: ‘I’m Relieved’
Wendy Williams Speaks Out Amid Wells Fargo Battle: ‘This Is Not Fair’
Justin Bieber: Judge Grants Motion For His Sexual Assault Accusers To Be Identified By Twitter
FKA Twigs Fights Shia LaBeouf’s Requests For Her ‘Highly Private’ Medical Information Ahead Of Sexual & Physical Abuse Trial
Cam Newton Reportedly Demands DNA Test In Nasty Custody Battle w/ Ex Kia Proctor
Bill Cosby’s Criminal Sexual Assault Case Prosecutor Requests Supreme Court Revive The Case
Miley Cyrus Sued For Allegedly Copying Bruno Mars’ Hit Song In Her Track ‘Flowers’
Shein Sues Temu For Alleged Design Theft, Claims Rival Company ‘Pushes Sellers To Infringe Upon Intellectual Property’