Gizelle Bryant & Robyn Dixon Blast ‘RHOA’ Newbie Brit Eady Over $20 Million Bravo Lawsuit, Says She Never Should’ve Been Cast: ‘Do Better’

Gizelle Bryant & Robyn Dixon Blast ‘RHOA’ Newbie Brit Eady Over $20 Million Bravo Lawsuit, Says She Never Should’ve Been Cast: ‘Do Better’

Gizelle Bryant and Robyn Dixon are weighing in on the latest RHOA drama, specifically Brit Eady’s $20 million defamation lawsuit against Bravo.

On a recent episode of their Reasonably Shady podcast, the RHOP star and alum made it clear they’re confused about why Brit believes she has grounds to sue in the first place. As you may recall, Brit filed a defamation suit against Bravo, accusing the network of knowingly and falsely misleading the public into believing explicit photos, shared on-camera by Kenya Moore, were of her when they actually were not. Kenya was removed from the show following the incident, while Brit continued filming, only to skip the reunion and then file her lawsuit shortly after.

Gizelle suggested that if anyone had a valid legal complaint, it was probably Kenya. She didn’t stop there, also taking aim at the casting process, saying producers need to “do better,” and insisted Brit should have never been cast in the first place. When Robyn offered that maybe Brit hadn’t revealed her true self during the interview process, Gizelle responded:

“There was history on this girl. She was a Stevie J girl. There’s so much that should’ve signaled to them this was not a good choice.”

Chileeeee, do y’all agree with Gizelle and Robyn, or do you think Brit earned her spot on the show? 

Authored by: Kay Johnson