Nick Gordon: I’m not responsible for Bobbi Kristina’s Death!

Bobbi Kristina, Nick Gordon

The legal drama continues between Nick Gordon and Bobbi Kristina Brown’s estate. According to Radar Online, Nick’s — who was the boyfriend of Bobbi Kristina — lawyers are in the process of filing a Motion to Dismiss the $10 million wrongful death lawsuit filed against him.

As previously reported, this summer an amended civil suit charged 26-year-old with giving her a “toxic cocktail rendering her unconscious” leading to her being found facedown in a water-filled bathtub at the townhouse the couple shared on Jan. 31. The suit also states Nick “put her face down in a tub of cold water causing her to suffer brain damage,” and that he beat Bobbi Kristina in the days and weeks before the life-ending incident. According to the site,

Gordon’s criminal lawyer Jose Baez had blasted the amended suit as “slanderous and meritless.” A source told Radar that the documents state eight points on why the court should dismiss the case. They include the fact that Gordon is not a Georgia resident; that he’s been a resident of Florida since the initial filing of the suit; that Gordon “did not commit any tortious act or omission within the state of Georgia. Plaintiff alleges no proof, several false criminal and frivolous claims against the Defendant”; that Gordon does not own, use or possess any real property in Ga.; that “Gordon and Bobbi Kristina were never married, as such, there are no proceeding for divorce, separate maintenance, annulment, or other domestic relations actions that may ordinarily occur in this state.” In spelling out that Gordon in no way committed the acts that were alleged, the motion also specifically states: “Plaintiff’s Complaint as answered by Defendant contains several unsupported conclusory, untrue criminal accusations that Defendant Nicholas Gordon committed acts that he simply did not do. Plaintiff has not provided any evidence including but not limited to, affidavits, police reports, indictments, and or any documentation to support baseless claims made against Defendant…”

[READ MORE ON THE NEXT PAGE.]