Ralph Yarl – Elderly Man Accused of Shooting Black Teenager Who Mistakenly Rang His Doorbell Headed To Trial

Ralph Yarl – Elderly Man Accused of Shooting Black Teenager Who Mistakenly Rang His Doorbell Headed To Trial
There is enough probable cause to push the white man accused of shooting Ralph Yarl to a trial.
After hearing from 12 witnesses, Clay County Judge Louis Angles determined that Andrew Lester, suspected of shooting Ralph Yarl after the teenager went to the wrong house by accident, will go on trial for a felony.
Andrew Lester arrived in court on Thursday beside his lawyer Steve Salmon, but chose not to take the witness stand.
According to Salmon said,
“The binding over of a defendant from a preliminary hearing is fairly normal. The prosecutor simply needs to provide probable cause to bind the case over.”
He added,
“There was certainly no evidence that race had anything to do with this incident. Also, there was an admission that Yarl grabbed the storm door handle of Lester’s door to gain access to the house. That is a critical aspect of this case and has been Mr. Lester’s contention all along.”
Ralph Yarl – who suffered a traumatic brain injury – and his mother, Cleo Nagbe, testified as the teenager spoke to Andrew Lester for the first time since the April 13 shooting.
During his testimony, Ralph Yarl described the events just before he was shot and said that he is still coping with the physical and psychological effects of the shooting.
The teenager said he was initially certain he was at the correct address his mother had given him to pick up his siblings, but he eventually got confused.
Yarl remembered hearing the main internal wooden door open and reaching for the locked glass storm door when he was shot twice, the first time in his head and the second time when he was on the ground.
He claimed that he never spoke to Andrew Lester, but after the incident, the elderly man warned him to never return to the location.
On April 17, Clay County prosecuting attorney Zachary Thompson announced that Lester, 84, had been charged with one count of first-degree felony assault and one count of armed criminal activity. He entered a not guilty plea and was freed on a $200,000 bond.
During the closing statements, the prosecutor argued that it was unreasonable for Lester to shoot an “unarmed kid” twice.
What are your thoughts on the entire situation? Let us know in the comments!
[VIA]
Previous Article
Next Article
33-Year-Old Woman Passes Away After Flight Crew Allegedly Forgot To Plug Oxygen Mask Into Tank Amid Medical Emergency
Jarvis Butts, Man Who M*rdered 13-Year-Old Na’ziyah Harris After Learning She Was Pregnant w/ His Child, Found De@d in Prison
TikTok Star Brenay Kennard Says ‘Husband-Stealing’ Lawsuit Ruined Her Income As Judge Delays $1.75 Million Payment
[UPDATE] Judge Grants $1 M*rder Bond For Georgia Woman Accused Of Taking Pills To Induce Abortion
Fentanyl Discovered In Packaging Of Barbie Dolls Sold At Discount Store
Latto Hints At New Music Following Brief Hiatus, Fans Think A Baby Announcement Could Be Next
Alabama Woman Mauled By 3 Pit Bulls While Walking To Work, Police Warned About Dogs Hours Before V!olent Attack
Filmmaker Ava DuVernay Debuts Boyfriend At The Oscars – Here’s What We Know About Her Mystery Man